Sydney 1974 to 2007: The archdiocese offered abuse victim John Ellis 30,000 dollars and denied the abuse in court in order to deter other victims from suing
John Ellis was sexually abused as an altar boy from the age of 13 to 17, from about 1974 to 1979, by Father Aidan Duggan in Sydney. In 2002 he turned to the Church's Towards Healing process. Shortly before Christmas Cardinal Pell wrote to him that he did not see anything the archdiocese could do. A Church-appointed assessor found the abuse more likely than not; the archdiocese offered 25,000, then 30,000 dollars. When Ellis sued, the archdiocese, according to the Royal Commission, defended vigorously, partly to deter other prospective plaintiffs, and disputed the abuse although its representative had accepted it; Ellis was cross-examined about it. Ellis lost in 2007 and was to pay the costs, up to 550,000 dollars.
- Period
- 1974-2007 (33 years)
- Country
- Australia
- Institutions
- Archdiocese of Sydney
Cardinal George Pell
Towards Healing - Category
- Sexual abuse, Cover-up
- Level of evidence
- A Primary source · what does this mean?
- Persons
- John Ellis (abused as an altar boy, sued the Archdiocese of Sydney)
Aidan Duggan (priest, according to the Church assessor probably abused John Ellis)
George Pell (Archbishop of Sydney, decided on the vigorous defence)
What happened to the people
Who was affected? Victims and numbers
- As a child, John Ellis was sexually abused by Father Aidan Duggan from about 1974 to 1979; he was an altar boy, Duggan an assistant priest at Bass Hill in Sydney. Ellis was 13 to 17, Duggan 54 to 59. A Church-appointed assessor concluded in 2003 that it was more likely than not that the allegations had occurred.
Evidence: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien, S. 4
„As a child, Mr John Ellis was sexually assaulted by Father Aidan Duggan from about 1974 to 1979.“
Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation, S. 4. Original · Archive copy Evidence: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien, S. 4
„Mr Ellis was aged between 13 and 17 years old and Father Duggan was aged between 54 and 59 years old.“
Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation, S. 4. Original · Archive copy Evidence: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien, S. 7
„Based upon the available evidence it is more likely than not that the allegations as alleged occurred.“
Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation, S. 7. Original · Archive copy
How were they charged and sentenced?
- When Ellis sued in 2004, Pell accepted the lawyers' advice to defend vigorously, also, according to the commission, to encourage other prospective plaintiffs not to sue the Church over child sexual abuse. The archdiocese disputed the abuse; according to the commission it contrived a way to maintain the non-admission, although its representative at the facilitation had accepted the abuse. Ellis was cross-examined about it, which Pell accepted was harmful and painful to him. The Church did not help him identify the proper defendant and did not bring to court a witness who had seen Ellis and Duggan kissing.
Evidence: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien, S. 12, Feststellung 18
„Another reason Cardinal Pell decided to accept the advice of Corrs Chambers Westgarth to vigorously defend the claim brought by Mr Ellis was to encourage other prospective plaintiffs not to litigate claims of child sexual abuse against the Church.“
Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation, S. 12, Feststellung 18. Original · Archive copy Evidence: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien, S. 12
„We are satisfied that the Archdiocese contrived an outcome that would allow them to maintain the non-admission of Mr Ellis’s abuse.“
Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation, S. 12. Original · Archive copy Evidence: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien, S. 13
„Cardinal Pell accepted that the instructions he gave resulted in Mr Ellis being cross-examined and challenged as to whether the abuse occurred, in circumstances which were harmful and painful to him.“
Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation, S. 13. Original · Archive copy Evidence: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien, S. 14, Feststellung 27
„Cardinal Pell was aware of, and generally agreed with, the advice of Corrs Chambers Westgarth that the Church’s lawyers should not help Mr Ellis identify a suitable defendant.“
Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation, S. 14, Feststellung 27. Original · Archive copy Evidence: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien, S. 14
„Corrs did not depose an affidavit from her and did not bring her evidence to the attention of either the Court or Mr Ellis.“
Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation, S. 14. Original · Archive copy
What happened to those affected?
- In May 2007 the Court of Appeal ruled for the archdiocese and ordered Ellis to pay the costs of Pell and the Trustees; the lawyers put them at up to 550,000 dollars. On Pell's instructions they offered to forgo them if Ellis did not seek leave to appeal to the High Court.
Evidence: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien, S. 15
„In May 2007, the Court of Appeal upheld the Trustees’ appeal against the judgment of Acting Justice Patten and ordered Mr Ellis to pay the legal costs of Cardinal Pell and the Trustees.“
Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation, S. 15. Original · Archive copy Evidence: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien, S. 16
„Corrs told Mr Ellis that their costs were likely to be up to $550,000 after assessment.“
Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation, S. 16. Original · Archive copy Evidence: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien, S. 16
„On Cardinal Pell’s instructions, Corrs conveyed an offer to forgo these costs if Mr Ellis agreed not to apply for special leave to appeal to the High Court.“
Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation, S. 16. Original · Archive copy
Background
Who received the assets, who profited?
- In May 2004 the archdiocese offered 25,000 dollars as a "gesture"; at the facilitation it became 30,000 dollars because Ellis had meanwhile lost his job. Ellis had asked for 100,000 dollars. Before the commission Pell called the offer "mean" and the logic of offering a man who had lost a 300,000-dollar job 5,000 dollars extra "grotesque".
Evidence: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien, S. 7
„On 20 May 2004, Mr Brazil informed Mr Ellis that he had been authorised to make a gesture of $25,000 on behalf of the Archdiocese.“
Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation, S. 7. Original · Archive copy Evidence: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien, S. 7
„Mr Ellis was told that the figure of $25,000 was increased by $5,000 because his employment had been terminated.“
Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation, S. 7. Original · Archive copy Evidence: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien, S. 8
„I regard as grotesque“
Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation, S. 8. Original · Archive copy Evidence: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien, S. 7
„the initial offer of $25,000 was ‘mean,’“
Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation, S. 7. Original · Archive copy Evidence: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien, S. 7
„Mr Ellis asked for $100,000“
Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation, S. 7. Original · Archive copy
Response of the Church
- On 23 December 2002 Archbishop Pell wrote to Ellis that, as Duggan could not respond and there were no other complaints, in the circumstances he did not see anything the archdiocese could do; Ellis received the letter on Christmas Eve. According to the commission the letter was contrary to the procedure, because an assessor should have been appointed. The commission finds that the archdiocese fundamentally failed Ellis in the Towards Healing process. He received no apology because, according to an adviser, it was not the archdiocese's normal practice to give one.
Evidence: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien, S. 5
„‘circumstances I do not see that there is anything the Archdiocese can do’“
Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation, S. 5. Original · Archive copy Evidence: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien, S. 5
„Mr Ellis received this letter on Christmas Eve, 2002.“
Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation, S. 5. Original · Archive copy Evidence: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien, S. 10, Feststellung 13
„The Archdiocese of Sydney fundamentally failed Mr Ellis in its conduct of the Towards Healing process“
Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation, S. 10, Feststellung 13. Original · Archive copy Evidence: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien, S. 8
„After the facilitation Mr Salmon advised Monsignor Rayner that it was not the normal practice of the Archdiocese to give an apology“
Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation, S. 8. Original · Archive copy
See also
-
1954-1997 · 43 years
Melbourne 1954 to 1997: Royal Commission found a "culture of secrecy" under Archbishop Little; offenders' resignations were disguised as ill health and minutes concealed the abuse
- Australia
- Sexual abuse
- Cover-up
-
1967-2001 · 34 years
Brisbane 1967 to 2001: Abuse victim Joan Isaacs received 30,000 dollars after two years of negotiation and had to commit herself to silence
- Australia
- Sexual abuse
- Cover-up
-
1996-2014 · 18 years
Melbourne from 1996: The Church's "Melbourne Response" compensation scheme capped payments to abuse victims at 50,000 dollars; victims were discouraged from going to the police
- Australia
- Sexual abuse
- Cover-up
Original documents to read
- Government report
Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australien: Report of Case Study No. 8: Mr John Ellis, Towards Healing and civil litigation. Original · Archive copy (retrieved 30 Oct 2026)
Change log (1)
The change log is kept in German only.
- : Aufgenommen
Last changed on 30 October 2026. Is something missing or wrong? Suggest an addition or correction.